W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > October 2000

RE: Issues with Packaging Application Payloads

From: Laird A Popkin <laird@io.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 19:20:02 -0500 (CDT)
To: "David E. Cleary" <davec@progress.com>
cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010201916430.21852-100000@fnord.io.com>
Now this I find very promising. What's the best way to understand the
current state of XML Schema? Could you possibly write up an XML fragment
of what it would look like to write an WML wrapper using "schema A" that
encapsulates an XML body using "schema B", where schemas A and B are
independent of each other?

On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, David E. Cleary wrote:

> > It seems to me that the problem with transporting arbitrary XML content in
> > XML messages is that there is no way to easily encapsulate arbitrary XML
> > within XML and validate it.
> 
> The 4th way is to use XML Schema and validate it against that instead of
> using DTDs.
> 
> David Cleary
> Progress Software
> 
Received on Friday, 20 October 2000 20:20:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:57 GMT