RE: [608] Discussion

• From: Oisin Hurley <ohurley@iona.com>
• Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 18:13:27 -0000
• To: <xml-dist-app@w3c.org>
• Message-ID: <004201c05a30$125208b0$9f03020a@psychobilly>

> What about the text:
>
> One particular example of protocols that one can envision XML Protocol
> bindings for are protocols that provide some sort of security mechanism.
> Typical examples of such protocols are SSL providing a secure channel, and
> S/MIME which provides a secure wrapper. It should be possible to
> specify XP bindings for such security protocols.

Yes, this kind of wording is a bit better as it expands on the use of
the example protocols. The first sentence could take some massaging to
say something like

"The XP transport protocol binding mechanisms must not preclude the
possibility
of constructing bindings to transport protocols that provide a security
mechanism."

 --oh

Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2000 13:13:25 UTC