RE: [608] Discussion

• From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>
• Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 10:29:46 -0800
• To: "Oisin Hurley" <ohurley@iona.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3c.org>
• Message-ID: <002701c05a32$5e0d2bc0$4a7f1cac@redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Ok, if we do the usual "transport" modifications :)

"The XML Protocol binding mechanism must not preclude the possibility of
constructing bindings to protocols that provide a security mechanism."

Henrik

> Yes, this kind of wording is a bit better as it expands on the use of
> the example protocols. The first sentence could take some massaging to
> say something like
> 
> "The XP transport protocol binding mechanisms must not preclude the
> possibility
> of constructing bindings to transport protocols that provide 
> a security
> mechanism."
> 
>  --oh
> 

Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2000 13:30:28 UTC