Re: XP Service URIs

Interesting question.  There's the case where some processing 
of the content is done at various intermediaries along the 
route -- in a sense there are multiple end-points, but I'm 
not sure you'd call it multicast as there is only one route.

Best regards,
Henry
-------------------------------------
At 10:13 AM 11/24/2000 +0100, MOREAU Jean-Jacques wrote:
>Kevin Mitchell wrote:
>
>> This wording raises an interesting question: Is there a requirement to
>> support mulitple
>> endpoints? I think there is. R806 clearly states that message components can
>> be targeted at > 1 intermediaries. I think this should also be true for
>> endpoints.
>
>Isn't this multicast?
>
>Jean-Jacques.
>
>