The SOAP header. After all, HTTP is out of scope for XP, so why waste cycles worrying about HTTP? :-) Best regards, Henry ------------------ At 10:05 AM 11/24/2000 +0100, MOREAU Jean-Jacques wrote: >Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > >> > Might I suggest that for interoperability with ebXML and >> > operation with >> > object oriented systems (e.g., DCOM), both the requestor and >> > destination >> > be specified by URIs and they be carried in the header (in case inter- >> > mediaries are involved, they will know where to find the >> > target destination). >> >> Having destination information be sent as a header makes a lot of sense. > >Hmm... are you both talking about the same header, i.e. HTTP header or SOAP >header? > >Jean-Jacques. > >Received on Monday, 27 November 2000 08:46:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:41:41 GMT