W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2000

Re: XP Service URIs

From: Henry Lowe <hlowe@omg.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 22:18:41 -0500
Message-Id: <4.1.20001126221643.03edfb70@emerald.omg.org>
To: "MOREAU Jean-Jacques" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>, Henry Lowe <hlowe@omg.org>, XML Distributed Applications List <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
The SOAP header.  After all, HTTP is out of scope for XP, 
so why waste cycles worrying about HTTP?  :-)

Best regards,
Henry
------------------
At 10:05 AM 11/24/2000 +0100, MOREAU Jean-Jacques wrote:
>Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
>
>> > Might I suggest that for interoperability with ebXML and
>> > operation with
>> > object oriented systems (e.g., DCOM), both the requestor and
>> > destination
>> > be specified by URIs and they be carried in the header (in case inter-
>> > mediaries are involved, they will know where to find the
>> > target destination).
>>
>> Having destination information be sent as a header makes a lot of sense.
>
>Hmm... are you both talking about the same header, i.e. HTTP header or SOAP
>header?
>
>Jean-Jacques.
>
>
Received on Monday, 27 November 2000 08:46:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:57 GMT