W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2000

RE: DR 703: 2 reqs in one + dup?

From: Murali Janakiraman <murali@roguewave.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 16:58:24 -0800
Message-ID: <F888C30C3021D411B9DA00B0D0209BE801E52A@cvo-exchange.roguewave.com>
To: "'MOREAU Jean-Jacques'" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
The fact that we are separating status as success only(and nothing to do
with error status), I tend to agree that these be split into 2 requirements,
one for error and another for success status.

Murali

-----Original Message-----
From: MOREAU Jean-Jacques [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 8:19 AM
To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Subject: DR 703: 2 reqs in one + dup?


I suggest the following requirement be split into two, 703a and 703b.

Furthermore, I consider 703a to be a duplicate of requirement 200,
bullet 3 ("Provision for specifying errors in a reply message.")


DR703a
              The XP specification must define a means to convey
              error information as a fault. The capability of XP
carrying
              a fault message must not depend on any particular
              protocol binding.

DR703b
             The XP specification must define a
              mechanism or mechanisms to allow the transfer of status
              information within an XP message without resort to use
              of XP fault messages or dependence on any particular
              interaction model.

Jean-Jacques.
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2000 20:08:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:57 GMT