W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2000

RE: DR 703: 2 reqs in one + dup?

From: Murali Janakiraman <murali@roguewave.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 16:58:24 -0800
Message-ID: <F888C30C3021D411B9DA00B0D0209BE801E52A@cvo-exchange.roguewave.com>
To: "'MOREAU Jean-Jacques'" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
The fact that we are separating status as success only(and nothing to do
with error status), I tend to agree that these be split into 2 requirements,
one for error and another for success status.


-----Original Message-----
From: MOREAU Jean-Jacques [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 8:19 AM
To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Subject: DR 703: 2 reqs in one + dup?

I suggest the following requirement be split into two, 703a and 703b.

Furthermore, I consider 703a to be a duplicate of requirement 200,
bullet 3 ("Provision for specifying errors in a reply message.")

              The XP specification must define a means to convey
              error information as a fault. The capability of XP
              a fault message must not depend on any particular
              protocol binding.

             The XP specification must define a
              mechanism or mechanisms to allow the transfer of status
              information within an XP message without resort to use
              of XP fault messages or dependence on any particular
              interaction model.

Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2000 20:08:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:10 UTC