RE: [DR300] Simplicity and layering

I have focused on making the destinction between what XP is compared to
what the "stuff" on top of XP is clear in the terminology section:

    http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xp-terms-01.html#N3040

Henrik

> I think I'd like to see some discussion as to what an 
> 'application' is in
> this context. One could argue that certain 'facilities' ( e.g.
> transactions ) are in fact applications in this context, that 
> is they are
> not part of XP per se, but run on top of XP. I don't want 
> people getting the
> idea that XP does everything up to the business ( or other ) 
> application
> boundary. Maybe a reference to use cases would be useful here...