W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2000

RE: [DR 612] Lotus "live with" (L) vote on 612

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 16:34:56 -0800
Message-ID: <005b01c04dd2$c1b2df10$fb4c1fac@redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Noah Mendelsohn" <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
What if we use the phrase "co-exist with existing HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1
applications." instead of "interoperate with existing HTTP applications."
This also makes it more clear that we are talking about well-behaved


> We substantially concur with this requirement.  However, the 
> phrase "Any protocol binding ... should demonstrate that it 
> can interoperate with 
> existing HTTP applications."  seems ambiguous and overlay 
> broad.  Surely 
> there are many http applications out there (mp3 players?) for 
> which XP 
> might prove to be completely irrelavant.
Received on Monday, 13 November 2000 19:35:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:10 UTC