W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > May 2000

RE: XML protocol comparison

From: Stefano POGLIANI <stefano@forte.com>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 17:15:41 +0200
To: "'Bernhard Dorninger'" <bernhard.dorninger@scch.at>, "'XML DistApp ML'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <005001bfb6a4$c9f85490$c43aa8c0@forte.com>
This is what I think too.

The BizTalk etc products are more like "EAI solutions", adding functionalities on the top of some basic protocols which may well be XMLRPC, SOAP or something different.

/stefano

» -----Original Message-----
» From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org 
» [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org]On
» Behalf Of Bernhard Dorninger
» Sent: Friday, May 05, 2000 5:13 PM
» To: XML DistApp ML
» Subject: XML protocol comparison
» 
» 
» Hi
» 
» The more I read specs and related material of the "protocols" 
» listed in
» Eric's matrix, th more I feel, that heavyweights like 
» BizTalk, eCo, ebXML
» should not be mentioned in one go with protocols like XMLRPC, 
» SOAP or WDDX.
» The former are far more than just protocols, they provide an 
» integrative
» infrastructure for E-commerce. So IMO BizTalk and Co. should 
» not directly be
» compared to XMLRPC and Co.,  I think the two "groups of 
» protocols" have been
» designed with completely different intentions.
» 
» Correct me, if I got it wrong :)
» 
» 
» regards
» Bernhard
» 
» ------------------
» Bernhard Dorninger
» 
» Software Competence Center Hagenberg GmbH
» Softwarepark Hagenberg, Hauptstraße 99
» A-4232 Hagenberg, Austria
» Tel.: +43 7236 3343 891
» Fax: +43 7236 3343 888
» mailto:bernhard.dorninger@scch.at
» http://www.scch.at
» 
» 
» 
Received on Friday, 5 May 2000 11:43:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:56 GMT