W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > March 2000

Re: XML protocol comparisons

From: Dave Winer <dave@userland.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:40:30 -0800
Message-ID: <131801bf99e8$eea61f30$1918ccce@murphy>
To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Oooops, sorry it's on the website, not in your list. Thanks.

Also the architects for XML-RPC are:

Bob Atkinson and Mohsen Al-Ghosein of Microsoft, Don Box of Developmentor,
and myself.

Dave


----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 5:17 PM
Subject: XML protocol comparisons


> I put together a comparison of a bunch of XML protocols,
>
> SOAP [http://www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix#SOAP]
> ICE [http://www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix#ICE]
> WDDX [http://www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix#WDDX]
> BizTalk [http://www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix#BizTalk]
> IOTP [http://www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix#IOTP]
> TIP [http://www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix#TIP]
> WfXML [http://www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix#WfXML]
> ebXML [http://www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix#ebXML]
> XMI [http://www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix#XMI]
>
> for everyone to discuss/dispute. It is said that the best way to get a
> question answered on usenet is to post an incorrect answer. Persuant
> to that, I have not done extensive readings of some of the protocol
> papers during my characterizations, but at least they're all there in
> a forum where we can compare apples and fruit baskets.
>
> I'll be adding more dimensions and would like feedback on what people
> wish to compare. Also, I'd like to have anchor-rich HTML versions of
> the documents so I can point to specific parts of the spec as
> supporting evidence.
>
> --
> -eric
>
> (eric@w3.org)
>
Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2000 20:41:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:56 GMT