> 1. there is more to bxxp than framing, e.g., user authentication, transport > security, and channel management (though you could layer that extra stuff on > top of smux if you wanted to define it all) Just curious, but why would you want to have all of this stuff crammed into one protocol? I think the layering approach is superior to a kitchen-sink type protocol. -- Justin Chapweske - Noodler, Cyrus Intersoft http://www.cyrusintersoft.com/Received on Thursday, 6 April 2000 12:05:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:41:39 GMT