W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2000

Re: XML protocol comparisons

From: Justin Chapweske <justin@cyrus.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 11:02:26 -0500
Message-ID: <38ECB512.E05A4B2@cyrus.net>
To: Marshall Rose <mrose+mtr.netnews@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
CC: michaelm@netsol.com, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
> 1. there is more to bxxp than framing, e.g., user authentication, transport
> security, and channel management (though you could layer that extra stuff on
> top of smux if you wanted to define it all)

Just curious, but why would you want to have all of this stuff crammed
into one protocol?  I think the layering approach is superior to a
kitchen-sink type protocol.

-- 
Justin Chapweske - Noodler, Cyrus Intersoft
http://www.cyrusintersoft.com/
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2000 12:05:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:56 GMT