- From: Justin Chapweske <justin@cyrus.net>
- Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 11:02:26 -0500
- To: Marshall Rose <mrose+mtr.netnews@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
- CC: michaelm@netsol.com, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
> 1. there is more to bxxp than framing, e.g., user authentication, transport > security, and channel management (though you could layer that extra stuff on > top of smux if you wanted to define it all) Just curious, but why would you want to have all of this stuff crammed into one protocol? I think the layering approach is superior to a kitchen-sink type protocol. -- Justin Chapweske - Noodler, Cyrus Intersoft http://www.cyrusintersoft.com/
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2000 12:05:17 UTC