W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-zig@w3.org > January 2009

Re: Requesting XML records via Z39.50

From: Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:12:02 +0000
Message-ID: <18816.12146.255248.930973@miketaylor.org.uk>
To: "Ray Denenberg" <raydenenberg@starpower.net>
Cc: <www-zig@w3.org>

Ray Denenberg writes:
 > So, we registered 1.2.840.10003.5.109.10 as the record syntax for
 > XML, for use as just described.  Then someone asked "XML version
 > 1.0 or 1.1"?  So we registered 1.2.840.10003.5.109.10.1.0 and
 > 1.2.840.10003.5.109.10.1.1 for these versions and designated
 > 1.2.840.10003.5.109.10 as "no specific version". Why did we
 > register these version specific identifiers? Because we thought we
 > had to; we didn't know any better at the time.
 > 
 > Three things in particular led to the implementor agreement, to use
 > 112 and put the schema in the element set name parameter.

... and let's not even get into Index Data's misappropriation of
1.2.840.10003.5.109.11 to represent application/xml as opposed to
text/xml :-)

 _/|_	 ___________________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor    <mike@indexdata.com>    http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  "Cold-hearted orb that rules the night // Removes the colors from
	 our sight // Red is gray, and yellow white // But we decide which
	 is right // And which is a quantization error" -- ppmtopgm(1)
	 manual entry.
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2009 10:21:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 October 2009 06:12:26 GMT