Re: CCL proposal (quotes)

> Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 12:27:02 -0400
> From: Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>
> 
> I suggest that we [...] define a type 105, which is a compatible
> subset of IEEE1003.2 but doesn't reference it. It's the reference to
> Z39.58 that's causing the problem. Call the new one regExp-3.

Ray,

This _is_ a joke, isn't it?  Isn't it?  Huh?  Huh?

 _/|_	 _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor   <mike@miketaylor.org.uk>   www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  "If you're not sure what your options are, pop the ball in
	 the net and we'll discuss it later" -- Bob Paisley.

Received on Thursday, 9 May 2002 09:39:59 UTC