Re: back to character encoding

Pieter Van Lierop wrote:

> I agree. But I would suggest to explicitly include Search Term when it is
> defined as OCTET STRING.

I understand your concern, Pieter, but I don't see any easy way to accomplish
this with the existing character set negotiation definition, short of amending
it (again!). If there is popular support for doing this, folks need to speak
up.

--Ray