RE: back to character encoding

Yes!  It should apply to the OctetString version of Term.  (It does in my
server.)

Ralph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Denenberg [mailto:rden@loc.gov]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:56 AM
> To: zig
> Subject: Re: back to character encoding
> 
> 
> Pieter Van Lierop wrote:
> 
> > I agree. But I would suggest to explicitly include Search 
> Term when it is
> > defined as OCTET STRING.
> 
> I understand your concern, Pieter, but I don't see any easy 
> way to accomplish
> this with the existing character set negotiation definition, 
> short of amending
> it (again!). If there is popular support for doing this, 
> folks need to speak
> up.
> 
> --Ray
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 15:41:30 UTC