W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-zig@w3.org > March 2002

Re: native encoding

From: Mike Taylor <mike@tecc.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 15:54:25 GMT
Message-Id: <200203011554.PAA02946@wells.tecc.co.uk>
To: rden@loc.gov
CC: quinn@indexdata.dk, www-zig@w3.org
> Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 10:26:16 -0500
> From: Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>
> 
> > Um. Weren't we talking about MARC records? Were do you stick a
> > suppliedVariant other than in a GRS-1 record?
> 
> You put the marc record in grs.  See
> http://lcweb.loc.gov/z3950/agency/agree/marcgrs.html

This is a good IA.  But Explain is a good service :-)
How many servers actually wrap MARC record like this?
How many do you think will start to do so in order to supply
character-set appliedVariants?

My guesses are, zero and zero.  In that order.  Sorry :-(

 _/|_	 _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor   <mike@miketaylor.org.uk>   www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  "Half a bee, philosophically, must ipso-facto half not-be,
	 / But half the bee has got to be, vis-a-vis its entity.
	 D'you see? / But can a bee be said to be, or not to be, an
	 entire bee, / When half the bee is not a bee, due to some
	 ancient injury?" -- Monty Python.
Received on Friday, 1 March 2002 10:54:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 October 2009 06:12:22 GMT