W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-zig@w3.org > March 2002

Re: native encoding

From: Sebastian Hammer <quinn@indexdata.dk>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 16:18:41 +0100
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20020301161610.012b5f10@bagel.indexdata.dk>
To: Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>, zig <www-zig@w3.org>
At 10:11 01-03-2002 -0500, Ray Denenberg wrote:

>Thus if utf-8 is negotiated it applies to
>everything unless explicitly overiden. If you want
>to request a record in an encoding other than
>utf-8, you include a variant request; if a server
>wants to supply a record in an encoding other than
>utf-8, it includes a supplied variant.

Um. Weren't we talking about MARC records? Were do you stick a 
suppliedVariant other than in a GRS-1 record?

Or is this an unfortunate re-use of the term supplied variant in the 
context of character set negotiation, or did I just miss something?

--Sebastian
--
Sebastian Hammer, Index Data <http://www.indexdata.dk/>
Ph: +45 3341 0100, Fax: +45 3341 0101
Received on Friday, 1 March 2002 10:18:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 October 2009 06:12:22 GMT