The character encoding discussion seems now to focus (and I use that term loosely) on native encodings, that is, if we negotiate utf-8 for a session and if a particular syntax has a well-known, native encoding other than utf-8, which applies? Perhaps I missed something and if so please refresh my memory: What is the objection to using variants? Thus if utf-8 is negotiated it applies to everything unless explicitly overiden. If you want to request a record in an encoding other than utf-8, you include a variant request; if a server wants to supply a record in an encoding other than utf-8, it includes a supplied variant. Please, if anyone objects to this approach speak up. --RayReceived on Friday, 1 March 2002 10:10:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 October 2009 06:12:22 GMT