W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-zig@w3.org > November 2001

Re: holdings-schema proposal

From: Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 18:26:28 -0500
Message-ID: <3C06C424.E78B6082@loc.gov>
To: zig <www-zig@w3.org>, Janifer Gatenby <janifer@wanadoo.fr>
Let's see if I can help clear up  part of this:

Janifer Gatenby wrote:

> Can we allow unstructured string data in
> "alternativeEnumeration" and
> "alternativeChronology" so that it can be used for simple
> flat display?

To which Joe Zeeman replied:

> It's already available in ChildEnumChronology.

And then Jan Said:

> ...... I can't find
> childEnumChronology - do I have the latest version?

I think Joe meant to say "childEnumChronSummary" not

And the point is this: you can stop recursion at any level
you want and instead provide a
child-enumeration/chronology-summary via

So if "issue 2" is represented recursively as a child of
"volume 5"  then, as has been pointed out, you don't (i.e.,
can't) represent "volume 5, issue 2" as a flat string. You
would represent issue 2 in the child structure subordinate
to volume 5. If you chose not to represent  issue 2 as a
child (i.e. recursively), then you can supply the flat
string "volume 5, issue 2" via childEnumChronSummary.

Received on Thursday, 29 November 2001 18:29:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:26:03 UTC