Robert Waldstein wrote: > > Just to weigh in (gee, thought I had switched to being a lurker) I strongly > disagree with the 2 points above (agreed with the rest). > explain PDUs (actually PDUs/BER in general) have very little overhead. > I have always found that impressive. I read that to mean overhead in the sense of complexity, not bytes (Rob?). Actually, I like ber, too, but new technologies like xml do the same thing, though in bloated form, and are more readily acceptable to other developers. That counts for something. > everything in explain were real things that someone argued for needing > for their implementation. The things you aren't interested in you don't send > and - in theory - your server then won't support those clients or functions. You're right, most of the stuff is optional. Kevin -- Kevin Gamiel Email: kgamiel@islandedge.com Island Edge Research, Inc. http://www.islandedge.com Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina Phone: +1-252-449-8969Received on Wednesday, 21 June 2000 15:47:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 October 2009 06:12:21 GMT