W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xsl-fo@w3.org > February 2001

RE: extensions to FO

From: Kelly Campbell <camk@channelpoint.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 12:21:22 -0700
Message-ID: <E583503B7F57D41196A600D0B76FDDD54B29A0@cpex2.channelpoint.com>
To: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
David,

Thanks for pointing this out. I forgot to mention it in my question.
Sebastian sent this example when I posed the question on the FOP list:

   <fo:block>
     <fotex:bookmark  
	xmlns:fotex="http://www.tug.org/fotex" 
	fotex-bookmark-level="2"
	fotex-bookmark-label="{@id}">
        Bookmark Title
     </fotex:bookmark>
   </fo:block>

The problem I have with this syntax is it's depending on the bookmark-level
attribute to determine where it is in the hierarchy rather than just using a
hierarchy via XML. I'm assuming that a bookmark with level 2 is just added
to the previous bookmark with a level="1". I think using the inherent
hierarchy structures available with XML would be a nicer solution.

I am hoping that the FO spec allows for the XSLT-like syntax of enclosing
elements from the FO spec inside elements from another namespace, and am
looking for clarification on that particular question.

Thanks,
Kelly

-----Original Message-----
From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@nag.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 12:05 PM
To: camk@channelpoint.com
Cc: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
Subject: Re: extensions to FO



You might want to look at the fotex:bookmark extension in Sebastian's 
passivetex FO implementation in xmltex.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
Received on Friday, 2 February 2001 14:22:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 3 October 2007 16:06:07 GMT