Elliotte Harold wrote: > I am now hypothesizing that fatal XInclude errors hidden inside > unactivated fallbacks are not fatal, and should not be reported. In any > case, this is what I am going to implement in XOM 1.0 (and what has been > implemented in the last several releases). If anyone disagrees with > that, please holler. Are you talking about unactivated fallbacks like <xinclude:include href="utf8.xml" parse="text"> <xinclude:fallback> Not activated because the top level element succeeds. <xinclude:include href="utf8.xml" parse="nonesuch"> </xinclude:fallback> </xinclude:include> or descendants of child elements like <xinclude:include href="utf8.xml" parse="text"> <p> Never processed <xinclude:include href="utf8.xml" parse="nonesuch"> </p> </xinclude:include> ? The cited paragraph seems to cover the latter case, but not the former one. I believe the former one still should be reported as a fatal error. -- Oleg Tkachenko http://blog.tkachenko.com Multiconn Technologies, IsraelReceived on Monday, 20 December 2004 19:04:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:16:10 GMT