- From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:02:28 -0500
- To: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org
After having read the final recommendation, I think I've changed my mind on what happens here, even though no text relevant to this has changed. I think the relevant sentence is: Other content (text, processing instructions, comments, elements not in the XInclude namespace, descendants of child elements) is not constrained by this specification and is ignored by the XInclude processor, that is, it has no effect on include processing, and does not appear in the children properties of the result infoset. I am now hypothesizing that fatal XInclude errors hidden inside unactivated fallbacks are not fatal, and should not be reported. In any case, this is what I am going to implement in XOM 1.0 (and what has been implemented in the last several releases). If anyone disagrees with that, please holler. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
Received on Monday, 20 December 2004 16:02:31 UTC