W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2012

[Bug 15648] New: Add XDM filtering to list of implementation-defined properties

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:50:31 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-15648-703@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

           Summary: Add XDM filtering to list of implementation-defined
           Product: XML Schema
           Version: 1.1 only
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Structures: XSD Part 1
        AssignedTo: David_E3@VERIFONE.com
        ReportedBy: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com
         QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
                CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com

The list of implementation-defined features in Appendix E.1 [1] needs to be
augmented to include the implementation-defined variation described in clause
1.2 of validation rule Assertion Satisfied (in Structures sec. [2]: 
by default, comments and processing instructions are excluded from the partial
PSVI constructed for assertion checking (and thus from the XDM instance against
which assertions are checked), but at user option processors may retain
comments and processing instructions instead of excluding them.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-1/#impl-def-list
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-1/#sec-cvc-assertion

It would probably be a good idea to check for the terms "user option",
"implementation-defined", and "implementation-dependent" to see if there are
other gaps in the lists of implementation-defined and -dependent features.

This is an editorial rather than a substantive issue.

Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 20 January 2012 18:50:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:12 UTC