- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 11:11:00 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9922 --- Comment #5 from David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> 2010-11-05 11:11:00 UTC --- In Lyon: The WG discussed this item and suggested that we move this bug back to "needsDrafting" with the instruction to make the change described in comment 1. The WG furter believes that we should abandon work by SG in comment 3. The WG agrees that the example is counter intuitive, but that it is admittedly a corner-case, and changes to the rules will undoubtedly have other counter-intuitive consequences. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 11:11:02 UTC