http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6722 Summary: Definition of laxly assessed is not clear Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 AssignedTo: David_E3@VERIFONE.com ReportedBy: David_E3@VERIFONE.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com At the telcon the WG approved the following wording in dispensation bug 5412. However, the WG wanted to open a new bug against the following wording: [Definition:] If the item cannot be ，strictly assessed，, because neither clause 1.1 nor clause 1.2 above is satisfied● or the necessary components are missing (see Missing Sub-components (′5.3)●, and the item is not ，skipped，, the element information item's schema validity must be laxly assessed by ，validating， with respect to ，xs:anyType， as per Element Locally Valid (Type) (′3.3.4.4) and assessing schema-validity of its [attributes] and [children] as per clause 2 and clause 3 above. If the element information item is ，skipped，, it must not be laxly assessed. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Friday, 20 March 2009 16:07:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:17 GMT