- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:58:31 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5918 --- Comment #1 from Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com> 2009-02-26 20:58:30 --- Given that we use an XSLT transformation to handle <override>, schema processors, in theory, do not need to deal with things under <override> directly, so most of the suggested changes do not apply. It seems only the last change in 3.17 needs to be made, for <redefine>. On the general question, we could define terms like "global" and "top-level". I would prefer to use global for components in the schema (those globally accessible) and top-level for definition items in schema documents (those under <schema> or <redefine>), because there are components that are global but not top-level (e.g. identity constraints), and definition items that are top-level but not global (e.g. those being redefined). Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:58:41 UTC