W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2008

RE: [XSCD] What is the status of XSCD? (Schema Components Designators)

From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 10:51:12 +0800
Message-ID: <648527B4E47AFB468DB88885E4C23ABF0105821B@exwa3-per.nexus.csiro.au>
To: <davep@iit.edu>, <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>

I don't think we are talking about the same thing, unless I've missed

I want the spec that describes how schema components are identified. The
2005 draft http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-ref/ describes an XPointer
scheme xscd() 

The link you provide is for the definitions of the built-in types in the
XML Schema language. 

Am I being dense?


Simon.Cox@csiro.au  CSIRO Exploration & Mining
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 
PO Box 1130, Bentley WA 6102  AUSTRALIA
T: +61 (0)8 6436 8639  Cell: +61 (0) 403 302 672
Polycom PVX:

ABN: 41 687 119 230

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Peterson [mailto:davep@iit.edu]
> Sent: Friday, 23 May 2008 10:11 AM
> To: Cox, Simon (E&M, Kensington); www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [XSCD] What is the status of XSCD?
> At 9:44 AM +0800 2008-05-23, Simon.Cox@csiro.au wrote:
> >The most recent document I can see is the 2005-03-29 WD.
> >Has this work stalled, or has it been superseded?
> Latest public version is the Last Call Working Draft at:
>     http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/
> This one is dated 17 Feb 2006.
> Since then there has been a lot of work by the WG preparing responses
> many comments.  A revised LCWD will be released "soon" (I hope).
> Meanwhile,
> there have been many interim drafts; however, they are all "current
> status"
> internal drafts not accessible by the general public.
> If I understand the system, the new LCWD will be at the URL given
> when it is released.  Each version has its own URL (e.g., that LCWD is
> also at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xmlschema11-2-20060217/) ane the
> short URL is "re-pointed" when a new version is released.
> (I'm hedging a bit there, for two reasons:  I'm not the guy who does
> releases, and I don't know how much more detail I can make public.
> guy who knows this stuff cold is up to his ears trying to get that
> finished, so I've taken it upon myself to respond to you.  Hope it
> --
> Dave Peterson
> SGMLWorks!
> davep@iit.edu
Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 02:52:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:08 UTC