In a similar vain, should defaultOpenContent be openContentDefault? Changing defaultAttributes to AttributesDefault doesn't seem right though! Pete. ============================================= Pete Cordell Codalogic Visit http://www.codalogic.com/lmx/ for XML Schema to C++ data binding ============================================= ----- Original Message ----- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org> To: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 12:38 PM Subject: [Bug 5274] Nomenclature: defaultXPathDefaultNamespace > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5274 > > Summary: Nomenclature: defaultXPathDefaultNamespace > Product: XML Schema > Version: 1.1 only > Platform: PC > OS/Version: Windows XP > Status: NEW > Severity: normal > Priority: P2 > Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 > AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org > ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com > QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > > > In general, defaults defined on the xs:schema element follow the > convention > that the default for the xxx attribute is named xxxDefault. So the default > for > the xpathDefaultNamespace attribute should be named > xpathDefaultNamespaceDefault rather than defaultXPathDefaultNamespace. > > However, I think that a more usable name for the attribute would be > xpathDefaultNamespace. > >Received on Monday, 19 November 2007 13:21:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 19 November 2007 13:21:04 GMT