http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2866 ------- Comment #1 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2006-09-29 01:40 ------- This proposal (allowing typed wildcards) is such a large step away from existing validation techniques that I think it's too large a step for a dot release. I'm not sure I understand the use cases properly, and some of the motivating examples I see in discussions strike me as just poor design that should not be encouraged. And as one of the commentators points out, many of the motivating examples could actually be solved with substitution groups. On the other hand, this might be precisely what is needed to solve what might be called the problem of architectural forms. So I propose to close this issue with a resolution of LATER.Received on Friday, 29 September 2006 01:40:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:13:40 GMT