http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2577 cmsmcq@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Comment #2 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2006-09-24 15:12 ------- Reviewing the open bugs, I find Noah's comment of last December, which puzzles me in one respect: what gives rise to the belief that either possible answer to this question has "the potential of two or more different versions of the same named definition or declaration being used in the same schema"? That's a very persuasive argument against the position that the effect of redefine should not be pervasive and that the resulting schema should be legal. If anyone had taken such a position, your argument would have, I hope, good effect in persuading them of their error. But it doesn't seem to bear on the issue that is actually before us, as that is outlined in the description of the issue.Received on Sunday, 24 September 2006 15:12:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:13:40 GMT