http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3027 ------- Comment #2 from davep@iit.edu 2006-09-03 16:38 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > As the WG was about to accept this recommendation, we realized that the words > are correct as stated. > The WG directed the editors to provide a Note more clearly explaining what is > being pointed out in this comparison. The Note or more explanatory in-line text will be provided. But in a msg to the Schema WG, Sandy pointed out that nonetheless the equality was not correct. Correct candidate equalities are either 2000-12-13+13:00 = 2000-12-12+11:00 and 2000-12-12+13:00 = 2000-12-11+11:00; one or the other will likely be used.Received on Sunday, 3 September 2006 16:39:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:13:40 GMT