http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2948 ------- Additional Comments From xan.gregg@jmp.com 2006-02-28 15:12 ------- Thanks for the quick response, Dave. I'm suggesting the text would be simpler *and* more precise to rely on the already-defined order relation instead or re-describing it. That is, replace clauses 1 and 2 with 1. the value is greater than {value}, according to the datatype's order relation. FWIW, I don't see any definition of "chronologically greater than".Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2006 15:11:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:13:39 GMT