[Bug 2947] Datatypes 2006-02-17 WD: what makes an order trivial?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2947





------- Additional Comments From xan.gregg@jmp.com  2006-02-28 15:22 -------
> I gather you feel we need some wordsmithing here.

Yes. I would prefer to get rid of all mention of a trivial order (and the "null"
order, for that matter). The min/max facets are still well-defined whether the
order is trivial or not. It's just that no value is value if there is a
minExclusive facet on a trivially ordered datatype, for exmaple. No big deal.

If you must keep the distiction of trivial vs. non-trivial orders, then add an
explicit definition.