W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2005

[Bug 2544] RQ-146: needs clarification re. wildcards

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:54:20 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1EeDzo-0000W2-Tk@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2544


sandygao@ca.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Keywords|                            |needsDrafting




------- Additional Comments From sandygao@ca.ibm.com  2005-11-21 15:54 -------
Proposals to discharge this requirement also cover RQ-17.

This item was classified as Req in the meeting of 2004-03-12.

This item was discussed in the meeting of 2004-04-09, in connection with RQ-17..

This item was discussed at 2005-11-11 F2F meeting.

The summary of the current proposal:

-no change to the 1.0 formulation of EDC 
- in the PSVI, check each child element against the gi/type bindings directly, 
indirectly, or implicitly present in the content model; the type assigned to 
the child must be compatible (validly derived from) with that given in the 
bindings for its gi. There are three possibilities here:
  - This applies to all elements without exception (this means skip wildcards 
may induce errors if and when they [appear to] match elements with the same 
names as elements used explicitly elsewhere in the content model). (The so-
called ‘level 3’.) 
  - This applies to all elements which have types (skip wildcards won't induce 
errors, but xsi:type may). (The so-called ‘level 2’.) 
  - This applies only to those elements which match an element declaration 
(xsi:type won't induce errors). (The so-called ‘level 1’.) 
  (Let us call this check the ‘EDC runtime check’.) 
- The EDC runtime check must be integrated into the definition of local 
validity, to connect with the text now in 3.4.6. 

RESOLVED: to adopt the level 2 version of the constraint.
Received on Monday, 21 November 2005 15:54:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:10 GMT