W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2005

[Bug 2096] R-106: Clarification requested re: facets for QName type

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:02:16 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1EDjSK-0004so-Vw@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2096


sandygao@ca.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Additional Comments From sandygao@ca.ibm.com  2005-09-09 14:02 -------
Discussed at the Apr. 26 telecon:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Apr/0084.html.

Re: question 1, the WG resolved:

to classify R-106a (length of QNames) as clarification w/ erratum, to specify 
in the erratum that tests on these facets for this type always succceed, and to 
deprecate the use of these facets for this type. 
to classify R-106b (length of NOTATION) as clarification w/ erratum, to specify 
in the erratum that tests on these facets for this type always succceed, and to 
deprecate the use of these facets for this type. 
to classify R-106c (length of anyURI) as clarification w/ erratum and to 
specify in the erratum that length is measured as the number of characters in 
the value (which as it happens is the same as the number of characters in the 
lexical form). 
No resolution on question 2 was reached.

May 2: Question 2 was discussed at the May 2 call and the WG resolved to 
classify it as a clarification without erratum.

Resolution
Draft text available at:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/0231.html 

Text reviewed/approved with ammendments, at Oct. 24 telecon.

Erratum E2-36 added.
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 14:02:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:09 GMT