W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2005

[Bug 2096] R-106: Clarification requested re: facets for QName type

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:01:55 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1EDjRz-0004sD-HW@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2096

           Summary: R-106: Clarification requested re: facets for QName type
           Product: XML Schema
           Version: 1.0
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: XSD Part 2: Datatypes
        AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
        ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
         QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org


QName allows the following facets: length, minLength, maxLength, pattern, 
enumeration, whiteSpace.

The validation rules for length, minLength, and maxLength facets in 4.3.1.3, 
4.3.2.3, 4.3.3.3 --when it comes to atomic variety-- are defined only for 
Strings and hex/base64Binary. 

Questions:

Do those three facets apply to the lexical or value space? If the latter, then 
how? The same question applies to NOTATION and anyURI (considering encoding) 
types. 
The other three facets (pattern, enumeration, whiteSpace) seem to apply to the 
lexical space. Is this correct? 

See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002JanMar/0218.html
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 14:02:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:09 GMT