Re: Restriction+choice+substitutionGroup

"Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@nortel.com> writes:

> SQC exhibits the same problem, and incidentally another problem with
> finalDefault.

That's disappointing. . .

> An in a similar vein, if the following statement is applied:
>     Note: Although the ·validation· semantics of a choice group does
>     not depend on the order of its particles, derived choice groups
>     are required to match the order of their base in order to simplify
>     checking that the derivation is OK.
> How does the validating parser know the "order" of the elements in a
> substitution group?

Yes, that's a long-standing glitch in the REC, which will be fixed in
1.1 we hope.  Perhaps that's why SQC is complaining . . .

ht
-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]