Regarding the draft at http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PER-xmlschema-2-20040318/: Section 4.2.4.1 says: When {variety} is ·list·, if ·length· or both of ·minLength· and ·maxLength· are among {facets}, then {value} is finite; else {value} is countably infinite. Is a minimum length restriction is really required? (I don't remember enough set theory to figure out why a minimum length would be required. (If the set of exactly-length-N lists is finite, wouldn't the set {length-1 lists, length-2 lists, ..., length-N-1 lists, length-N lists} not be finite?) I wonder if the pattern of having both upper and lower bounds (min...clusive and max..clusive cases) accidently got copied to the list case without dropping the possibly unnecessary lower bound. Daniel DanielReceived on Thursday, 10 June 2004 16:32:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:13:33 GMT