W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: Part 2: problems with 'pattern' spec

From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:13:20 -0800
Message-Id: <8904C60CACA7D51191BC00805FEAAF4358EA83@crdc-exch-7.crdc.kp.org>
To: "'Ross Thompson'" <rthompson@contivo.com>, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Ross Thompson [SMTP:rthompson@contivo.com]
> Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 8:45 AM
> To:	www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
> Subject:	Part 2: problems with 'pattern' spec
> 
> 
> I found two problems, I think, with the specification of the pattern
> attribute.  
> 
> 1) The type of the 'value' attribute of pattern is 'anySimpleType.'
>    Should it not be 'string'?
> 
Yes, I believe you are correct.  We will add this to the list of things to
prepare errata for, thanx.

> 2) The definition of 'atom' in the BNF for regular expressions says 
> 
Henry replyed to this part [1], and he is correct...the production for Char
says that any legal XML character EXCEPT those explicitly mentioned is
allowed...and hence, there is no abiguity.

pvb

References
[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002JanMar/0468.
html
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2002 16:29:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:15:33 UTC