W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2002

some inconsistencies

From: David Stephenson <david_stephenson@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 18:36:01 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.1.20020514183556.02aa4420@localhost>
To: W3C XML Schema Comments list <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Hi
     there are some inconsistencies between the xml schema schema and the 
english specification (which rules?) that should be cleaned up.
     Specifically the english specification parts ommit annotations where 
they are permitted in the schema schema. Two examples are:
     attributes uses 
<http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#AU_details>http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#AU_details 

and
     element in 
<http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#declare-element>http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#declare-element 
for the last three cases Particle*2 & , Elemnt Decl.

more generally we should ensure the spec allows annotations where the 
schema schema allows them (i.e in most places).

is this a bug in the current spec or were annotations ment to be illegal in 
these places?

Cheers
     David


----------
  1e2865.jpg
David Stephenson
Web Services
HPMD
Hewlett-Packard

Phone:++1-408 3436141
Fax: ++1-408 3436777
Telnet 343-6141
<mailto:david_stephenson@hp.com>david_stephenson@hp.com

----------






1e2865.jpg
(image/jpeg attachment: 1e2865.jpg)

Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2002 13:34:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:00 GMT