- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 20 Nov 2001 09:32:40 +0000
- To: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <kohsuke.kawaguchi@sun.com>
- Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <kohsuke.kawaguchi@sun.com> writes:
> I think the following derivation is valid:
>
> <xs:complexType name="B">
> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="urn:foo" processContents="strict"/>
> </xs:complexType>
>
> <xs:complexType name="D">
> <xs:complexContent>
> <xs:restriction base="B">
> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="urn:foo" processContents="skip"/>
> </xs:restriction>
> </xs:complexContent>
> </xs:complexType>
>
> But in this derivation D is not a subset of B (i.e., some content model
> is valid wrt to D but not with B)
You're right -- I could have sworn we put something in about that, but
I don't see it -- I guess I'm thinking of defaults, which we did
catch. This could/should perhaps be fixed independently of revisiting
restriction in general.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2001 04:31:43 UTC