- From: <rwadin@cacheon.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 01:49:56 -0800
- To: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
1) In Section 4 Normalization, the description for the EXTEND ELEMENT BASE rule reads: An attribute name can be normalized if ... It should read: An element name can be normalized if ... 2) The next paragraph starts with: We write x |- d => dt to indicate ... dt should be changed to td. 3) The note under TYPED ELEMENT reads: The (TYPED ELEMENT) rule uses the relation x < :x?, which is defined Section 5.1. The <: relation is first used much earlier, in the EXTEND ATTRIBUTE TRANSITIVE rule, and this note should probably be copied or moved there. 4) In Section 5.2 Extension, the second sentence reads: ... attribute groups ag and element groups ag ... The second "ag" should be an "eg". 5) In Section 6.1 Content Validation, the GIVEN NAMESPACE, ANY LOCAL rule starts with: namespace(x) = i It should start: namespace(e) = i 6) The WILDCARD ITEM rule seems meaningless: e inW v ------------------- e inW v If it's correct, there needs to be a short description explaining what this rule means. 7) The need for both the WILDCARD SUM 1 rule *and* the WILDCARD SUM 2 rule is not obvious. Aren't these sums commutative? w1 + w2 = w2 + w1 and therefore: e inW w1 + w2 ------------------------- e inW w2 + w1 and so no need for two rules? -Ray
Received on Friday, 23 March 2001 04:48:49 UTC