W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2001

RE: xmlschema-formal: Inference rules

From: <rwaldin@cacheon.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 01:49:11 -0800
To: "'Fuchs, Matthew'" <matthew.fuchs@commerceone.com>, <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000201c0b37e$83daa710$0c00070a@cacheon.com>
And I thank all of you for the work you've all put into this document.  I'm
just trying to understand this difficult topic, and it really helps to read
carefully.  So carefully in fact that I can't help but notice some typos
that are otherwise easily missed.  :)

-Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fuchs, Matthew [mailto:matthew.fuchs@commerceone.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 3:37 PM
> To: 'rwaldin@cacheon.com'; www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
> Subject: RE: xmlschema-formal: Inference rules
>
>
> Ray,
>
> On behalf of the editors, I'd like to thank you for the
> careful reading
> you're giving us.
>
> Matthew
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ray S. Waldin [mailto:rwaldin@cacheon.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 3:24 PM
> > To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
> > Subject: xmlschema-formal: Inference rules
> >
> >
> > Section 3.8 Inference Rules show the following example:
> >
> > 		d1 in g1       d2 in g2
> > 	-------------------------------------
> > 			d1 ,d2 in g1
> >
> > The judgement below the line seems to be missing ",g2"
> > following "g1".
> >
> > -Ray
> >
Received on Friday, 23 March 2001 04:48:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:50 GMT