Re: CR-33 adding a formal grammar for regexes

Yes, I am satisfied.

"C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" wrote:
> 
> Dear James -
> 
> As you are aware, the W3C XML Schema Working Group has spent the
> last several weeks working through the comments received from the
> public on the Candidate Recommendation (CR) of the XML Schema specification.
> We thank you for the numerous comments you made on our specification during
> our CR comment period, and want to make sure you know that all
> comments received during the CR comment period have been recorded
> in our CR issues list (http://www.w3.org/2000/12/xmlschema-crcomments.html).
> 
> Among several others, you raised the point registered as issue
> CR-33 Add a formal grammar for regular expressions?
> 
> Specifically, you suggested that the definition of regular expressions
> would be clearer and easier to understand if a formal grammar were
> provided.  The WG agrees, and has instructed the editors to provide
> one in the next publication of the specification.
> 
> It would be helpful to us to know whether you are satisfied with the
> decision taken by the WG on this issue, or wish your dissent from the
> WG's decision to be recorded for consideration by the Director of
> the W3C.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Michael Sperberg-McQueen
> XML Schema Working Group