W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Omission in <element> constraint in Schema Structures spec

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 06 Mar 2001 13:38:30 +0000
To: mhuffman@ca.ibm.com
Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b1ysbvwyx.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
mhuffman@ca.ibm.com writes:

> Thank you, Henry.
> 
> I see in SforS that attributes "substitutionGroup" and "final" have use
> ="prohibited" for local elements.  That leaves "abstract" and "form".
> I don't believe they apply to a local element with ref="...".  Is this
> explicitly specified somewhere else in the spec documents? If not, can they
> simply be added to the other "must be absent" attributes in the constraint
> I referenced below?

Thanks for pushing on this.  I need to check a bit further, but I
think you're right that
 
 a) abstract doesn't belong on local elements, with or without ref;
 b) form doesn't belong on local elements with ref.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2001 08:38:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:49 GMT