W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2001

RE: SOX reference

From: Fuchs, Matthew <matthew.fuchs@commerceone.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:30:07 -0800
Message-ID: <4C4A7BE77CE1D311A1D200508BA38C1202F353CE@venus.commerceone.com>
To: "'Michael Fitzgerald'" <mike@wyeast.net>, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org

Thank you for picking up on this.  SOX-1.1 was an interim version of SOX
which was neither submitted to the W3C nor fully implemented by Commerce
One.  I do not know if there is a publicly available URI for it at this
time.  However, XSDL in its final form is far more dependent on our SOX-2
submission at [1] than than the 1.1 version (although I believe it was 1.1
that introduced first class attribute and model groups as found in XSDL).
Therefore this should really be replaced with:

"SOX-2  Schema for Object-oriented XML 2.0, Andrew Davidson et al., W3C 1999
See http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-SOX/"


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-SOX/

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Fitzgerald [mailto:mike@wyeast.net]
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 9:45 AM
> To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
> Subject: SOX reference
> I know this is past the 15 Dec. 2000 deadline, but I offer the comment
> nevertheless.
> In the references section you have:
> "SOX-1.1   Schema for Object-oriented XML, Version 1.1, Matt 
> Fuchs, et al.
> W3C, 1999. See ???"
> I don't imagine the question marks will remain in the final 
> draft. Does XML
> Schema reference SOX 1.1 specifically? If not, perhaps, if 
> you do not drop
> the reference, you may want to link to the most recent (v3.0) SOX
> specification, available at http://www.xcbl.org/xcbl30/xcbl30sox.html.
> I am not affiliated with Commerce One in any way.
> Best of luck as you complete XML Schema.
> Mike
> =====
> Wy'east Communications    http://wyeast.net    mailto:mike@wyeast.net
Received on Monday, 29 January 2001 14:30:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:49 GMT