W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2001

RE: Ambiguity in Lists

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 09:49:40 -0700
Message-ID: <9D884881F5E1F24FB845967851720FC31D1A7F@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Ed Shaya" <eshaya@katherine.physics.umd.edu>, <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Ed:
You raise an interesting point.  The XML Schema list datatype 
is space separated.  I believe you are asking for a list datatype
where the tokens are separated not by spaces but by number of
characters.
I don't see this as a bug but rather a requirement for a different
type of list. 

All the best, Ashok 
===========================================================
Ashok Malhotra              <mailto: ashokma@microsoft.com> 
Microsoft Corporation
212 Hessian Hills Road
Croton-On-Hudson, NY 10520 USA 
Redmond: 425-703-9462                New York: 914-271-6477 



-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Shaya [mailto:eshaya@katherine.physics.umd.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 8:38 AM
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Subject: Ambiguity in Lists

Sirs:

        I wish to point out that the Schema Part 2 description of lists
datatypes does
not specify what happens in the circumstance that the atomic components
are
strings of a specified length (via a restriction of length="8", say) and
some of
these have spaces within them.  Are parsers required to return these
atomic
components intact within a list?  Do validators count them as a single
atom?  If
so, it will requires extra complexity in the parser/validator to first
locate
PROPER S boundaries between proper atomic units before counting atomic
units or
parsing them.  If not, then one looses an important functionality of
lists.

Ed Shaya
Chief Scientist
Astronomical Data Center/NASA
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2001 13:06:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:50 GMT