I note that http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/ indicates no less than *three* different URI forms that might be applicable: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema#... (section 3) http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#... (section 3.1, schema) http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes#... (section 3.1) Then there's appendix A, which is somewhat schizophrenic about whether or not it is normative (the heading say it is, the schema comments say it isn't.) + I think the section 3 form noted above is probably an error. + I think the normative status comments in the schema text need to be aligned with the document section heading. At http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#schema: Heading: A Schema for Datatype Definitions (normative) Schema comment: <!-- XML Schema schema for XML Schemas: Part 2: Datatypes --> <!-- Note this schema is NOT the normative datatypes schema. --> <!--d--> <!-- The prose copy in the structures REC is the normative --> <!--d--> <!-- version (which shouldn't differ from this one except for --> <!--d--> <!-- this comment and entity expansions, but just in case --> <!--d--> #g ------------ Graham Klyne (GK@ACM.ORG)Received on Thursday, 26 April 2001 08:58:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:50 GMT