Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org> writes: > Henry S. Thompson wrote: > > > > The terminology or conformance sections could explain that: > > > The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL > > > NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and > > > "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in > > > [RFC2119]. > > > with RFC 2119 as a normative reference. If you don't want to use the > > > RFC, then you could explain why not. > > > > I've used the prose from XML 1.0 (2e) now for 'may' and 'must', > > Sorry, do you mean in a version other than 20010330 or in that one? In a new version which I hope to get where you can see it soon. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2001 02:10:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:50 GMT