W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: comments for XML Schema 20010330

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 17 Apr 2001 07:10:38 +0100
To: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>
Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b66g4ukdd.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org> writes:

> Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> 
> >  > The terminology or conformance sections could explain that:
> >  >      The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
> >  >      NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED",  "MAY", and
> >  >      "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
> >  >      [RFC2119].
> >  > with RFC 2119 as a normative reference. If you don't want to use the
> >  > RFC, then you could explain why not.
> >
> >  I've used the prose from XML 1.0 (2e) now for 'may' and 'must',
> 
> Sorry, do you mean in a version other than 20010330 or in that one?

In a new version which I hope to get where you can see it soon.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2001 02:10:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:12:50 GMT