- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 17 Apr 2001 07:10:38 +0100
- To: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>
- Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org> writes:
> Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>
> > > The terminology or conformance sections could explain that:
> > > The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
> > > NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
> > > "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
> > > [RFC2119].
> > > with RFC 2119 as a normative reference. If you don't want to use the
> > > RFC, then you could explain why not.
> >
> > I've used the prose from XML 1.0 (2e) now for 'may' and 'must',
>
> Sorry, do you mean in a version other than 20010330 or in that one?
In a new version which I hope to get where you can see it soon.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2001 02:10:53 UTC